|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Clave
Guest
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 5:42 am Post subject: Re: Common Knowledge |
 |
|
"COL. BILL KILGORE" <w_s_kilgore@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fkkpmm$bc4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
<...>
| Quote: | The question put to you was a simple one. Why was the intel "wrong"
on Iraq and correct on "Iran"? Why are you such a bald-faced liar?
I answered that question, and The Pusscake couldn't handle it.
You answered zilch, as per usual; you re-established yourself as
ARTD-L's resident "gasbag with an ego", as expected.
|
Reaffirming the time-proven principle that the surest way to know a modern
Republican is to attribute to them everything they accuse their enemies of.
| Quote: | Once more for the alzheimer's-impaired Pusscake:
Lemme put it into as few syllables as a Pusscake needs: If the
"intelligence" wasn't reliable enough to start a war then, it's
not reliable enough to start a war now.
It's not an "answer"; it's an "opinion", and the opinion of a left-wing
kook like you is hardly noteworthy.
|
What *is* noteworthy is Pusscake's total inability to make any coherent
argument against it. Not surprising, really -- Pusscake doesn't do well
*any* time someone shoves facts up her ass.
Jim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google
Sponsor
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 5:42 am Post subject: Advertisement |
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hawkster
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 6:00 am Post subject: Re: Common Knowledge |
|
|
"Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote in news:zcSdnV15S-
ZBIPDanZ2dnUVZ_t-hnZ2d@cablespeedwa.com:
| Quote: | "flanier" <bflanier@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e3ed70a3-25ed-4c18-b50e-a01ee8fa9588
@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 22, 2:21 pm, "COL. BILL KILGORE" <w_s_kilg...@yahoo.com> wrote
replying to my post: "Yah, that's what I said!."
No it isn't. ...
kilgore, your problems with the language are a matter of little
concern to me.
Is there any chance you can engage in intelligent discussions with
anyone?
=============================
None. Zero. Don't even ask.
HTH,
Jim
|
This just in.... concerning Smokin' Jak Bongwater & Angry White Oz:
(wait for it)
Ditto. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
COL. BILL KILGORE
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 5:01 pm Post subject: Re: Common Knowledge |
|
|
"Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:ZsmdncVk0ZmxaPDanZ2dnUVZ_q-jnZ2d@cablespeedwa.com...
| Quote: | "COL. BILL KILGORE" <w_s_kilgore@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fkkpmm$bc4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
...
The question put to you was a simple one. Why was the intel "wrong"
on Iraq and correct on "Iran"? Why are you such a bald-faced liar?
I answered that question, and The Pusscake couldn't handle it.
You answered zilch, as per usual; you re-established yourself as
ARTD-L's resident "gasbag with an ego", as expected.
Reaffirming the time-proven principle that the surest way to know a modern
Republican is to attribute to them everything they accuse their enemies
of.
Once more for the alzheimer's-impaired Pusscake:
Lemme put it into as few syllables as a Pusscake needs: If the
"intelligence" wasn't reliable enough to start a war then, it's
not reliable enough to start a war now.
It's not an "answer"; it's an "opinion", and the opinion of a left-wing
kook like you is hardly noteworthy.
What *is* noteworthy is Pusscake's total inability to make any coherent
argument against it. Not surprising, really -- Pusscake doesn't do well
*any* time someone shoves facts up her ass.
Jim
|
Oh, we know all about your "facts", clown. How's that Rove indictment
coming along? That was one of the "facts" you presented to us a while back.
What really is laughable is the way you imagine yourself as a knowledgable
poster who is always here to "set the facts straight", when in reality you
are nothing more than a low-life troll who offers nothing but name-calling
and one-line responses. Oh, did we forget to mention it? You're also a
fucking coward who doesn't have the genitalia to admit a fuck up (ala Jason
Leopold). You wish you could shove "facts" up someone's ass, but alas, you
can't because your hands are full carrying your own ass around after having
it handed to you on an almost daily basis (usually by The Colonel). Now go
play clown, there's a kids party out there somewhere looking for you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 5:50 pm Post subject: Re: Common Knowledge |
|
|
Clave wrote:
| Quote: | "COL. BILL KILGORE" <w_s_kilgore@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fkkpmm$bc4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
...
The question put to you was a simple one. Why was the intel "wrong"
on Iraq and correct on "Iran"? Why are you such a bald-faced liar?
I answered that question, and The Pusscake couldn't handle it.
You answered zilch, as per usual; you re-established yourself as
ARTD-L's resident "gasbag with an ego", as expected.
Reaffirming the time-proven principle that the surest way to know a modern
Republican is to attribute to them everything they accuse their enemies of.
Once more for the alzheimer's-impaired Pusscake:
Lemme put it into as few syllables as a Pusscake needs: If the
"intelligence" wasn't reliable enough to start a war then, it's
not reliable enough to start a war now.
It's not an "answer"; it's an "opinion", and the opinion of a left-wing
kook like you is hardly noteworthy.
What *is* noteworthy is Pusscake's total inability to make any coherent
argument against it. Not surprising, really -- Pusscake doesn't do well
*any* time someone shoves facts up her ass.
|
By the way this guy is desperately spamming a single long-forgotten
event that merits the newsworthiness of a footnote, you sure must have
been kicking his ass for the last few years.
Shall we take a wild guess that he was predicting Republican victory
last year, and boasting that Wolfowitz, Rove, Gonzales, Rumsfeld and
the rest would be in government positions for the duration of the Bush
administration?
I bet if we looked back further we would find support for claims of
Iraqi nukes, WMD stockpiles being found, easy victory in Iraq and a
budget surplus too.
Sounds like the fake Colonel is licking his wounds to me.....perhaps
you should go easier on him.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Clave
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:39 pm Post subject: Re: Common Knowledge |
|
|
"COL. BILL KILGORE" <w_s_kilgore@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fkm49m$l4a$1@registered.motzarella.org...
| Quote: |
"Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:ZsmdncVk0ZmxaPDanZ2dnUVZ_q-jnZ2d@cablespeedwa.com...
"COL. BILL KILGORE" <w_s_kilgore@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fkkpmm$bc4$1@registered.motzarella.org...
...
The question put to you was a simple one. Why was the intel "wrong"
on Iraq and correct on "Iran"? Why are you such a bald-faced liar?
I answered that question, and The Pusscake couldn't handle it.
You answered zilch, as per usual; you re-established yourself as
ARTD-L's resident "gasbag with an ego", as expected.
Reaffirming the time-proven principle that the surest way to know a
modern Republican is to attribute to them everything they accuse their
enemies of.
|
Nice of The Pusscake to tacitly acknowledge the truth of that.
| Quote: | Once more for the alzheimer's-impaired Pusscake:
Lemme put it into as few syllables as a Pusscake needs: If the
"intelligence" wasn't reliable enough to start a war then, it's
not reliable enough to start a war now.
It's not an "answer"; it's an "opinion", and the opinion of a left-wing
kook like you is hardly noteworthy.
What *is* noteworthy is Pusscake's total inability to make any coherent
argument against it. Not surprising, really -- Pusscake doesn't do well
*any* time someone shoves facts up her ass.
Oh, we know all about your "facts", clown...
|
Right on cue. I answered The Pusscake straight up, and The Pusscake could't
say one coherent thing to the contrary.
Gimme my hook back.
Jim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Clave
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 pm Post subject: Re: Common Knowledge |
|
|
<Frank.Etch@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ad35998b-3180-442f-a5c3-7ebace62b24b@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
<...>
| Quote: | What *is* noteworthy is Pusscake's total inability to make any coherent
argument against it. Not surprising, really -- Pusscake doesn't do well
*any* time someone shoves facts up her ass.
By the way this guy is desperately spamming a single long-forgotten
event that merits the newsworthiness of a footnote, you sure must have
been kicking his ass for the last few years.
|
The Pusscake has been on the wrong side of pretty much every single issue
since she reared her pretend head here. I was wrong about the Rove
indictment. That's really the *only* instance The Pusscake can think of
in the past 7 years.
Like I've said, it's the only pea in The Pusscake's shooter, so he trots it
out every time he replies to me, as if I'm supposed to be more embarrassed
about being wrong that time than he is about being wrong about something
pretty much every single day.
My God -- can you imagine the poor Pretend General who had to rely on this
fool to carry out duties commensurate with the rank of Pretend Colonel?
| Quote: | Shall we take a wild guess that he was predicting Republican victory
last year, and boasting that Wolfowitz, Rove, Gonzales, Rumsfeld and
the rest would be in government positions for the duration of the Bush
administration?
I bet if we looked back further we would find support for claims of
Iraqi nukes, WMD stockpiles being found, easy victory in Iraq and a
budget surplus too.
Sounds like the fake Colonel is licking his wounds to me.....perhaps
you should go easier on him.
|
I already pretty much ignore The Pusscake. Mostly I delete her twaddlings
without reading them -- it's been literally years since she had anything
original to say about *anything*. I've long suspected she's an ELIZA
variant.
Bark, Pusscake!
Jim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
