|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
River Rat Mike Guest
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:09 am Post subject: Task Manager indications |
|
|
Can someone confirm there is something wrong with these Task Mang numbers?
My CPU Runs 100%, 100% of the time. I think that indicates the root cause
for a variaty of problems I expierience. I don't know if it is Software,
Hardware, or No Problem at all. I don't know what the Task Manager Main
Headings are suppossed to look like if they were correct. BUT I THINK THEY
ARE SAYING SOMETHING IS REAL SCREWED UP.
Under the "Processes" Tab, bottom of page task bar reads Processes=47 CPU
Usage =100% Commit Charge=266M/919M
The first 2 Image Name Items are
PID=0,ImageName=SystemIdleProcess, BasePsi=N/A, CPU=0
PID=4, ImageName=System, BasePsi=Normal, CPU=96/ 85-98When fluctuates
Can someone confirm ther is something wrong with these numbers? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google Sponsor

|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:09 am Post subject: Advertisement |
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KM Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:10 pm Post subject: Re: Task Manager indications |
|
|
Looks like you posted to the wrong NG. Is your OS XP Home or XP Pro? If so, please post to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
newsgroup.
And I'd suggest you first to check what process from the list in the Task Manager takes most of the CPU time. Then you mat know who
is responsible for the system slowness.
--
=========
Regards,
KM
"River Rat Mike" <River Rat Mike@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:805F3AA6-0413-492D-89C6-88DA405FC16B@microsoft.com...
| Quote: | Can someone confirm there is something wrong with these Task Mang numbers?
My CPU Runs 100%, 100% of the time. I think that indicates the root cause
for a variaty of problems I expierience. I don't know if it is Software,
Hardware, or No Problem at all. I don't know what the Task Manager Main
Headings are suppossed to look like if they were correct. BUT I THINK THEY
ARE SAYING SOMETHING IS REAL SCREWED UP.
Under the "Processes" Tab, bottom of page task bar reads Processes=47 CPU
Usage =100% Commit Charge=266M/919M
The first 2 Image Name Items are
PID=0,ImageName=SystemIdleProcess, BasePsi=N/A, CPU=0
PID=4, ImageName=System, BasePsi=Normal, CPU=96/ 85-98When fluctuates
Can someone confirm ther is something wrong with these numbers? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
River Rat Mike Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:04 pm Post subject: Re: Task Manager indications |
|
|
KM: Thank you very much for your response on the MS “thig-a-ma-jig”, which I
am as familiar with as Task Manager or EG. I think you are telling me, what
I am guessing, does NOT look right. You ask what “Process” is using the bulk
of the CPU 100% Time. I said PID4-SYSTEM is using whatever any and every
other Process Is Not. For Instance, while running Task Manager, if
PID??-TaskManager=03% PID4-System=97% Seeeeeeeeeeee?????? Somethin’ Wrong;
Huaa??????
"KM" wrote:
| Quote: | Looks like you posted to the wrong NG. Is your OS XP Home or XP Pro? If so, please post to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
newsgroup.
And I'd suggest you first to check what process from the list in the Task Manager takes most of the CPU time. Then you mat know who
is responsible for the system slowness.
--
=========
Regards,
KM
"River Rat Mike" <River Rat Mike@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:805F3AA6-0413-492D-89C6-88DA405FC16B@microsoft.com...
Can someone confirm there is something wrong with these Task Mang numbers?
My CPU Runs 100%, 100% of the time. I think that indicates the root cause
for a variaty of problems I expierience. I don't know if it is Software,
Hardware, or No Problem at all. I don't know what the Task Manager Main
Headings are suppossed to look like if they were correct. BUT I THINK THEY
ARE SAYING SOMETHING IS REAL SCREWED UP.
Under the "Processes" Tab, bottom of page task bar reads Processes=47 CPU
Usage =100% Commit Charge=266M/919M
The first 2 Image Name Items are
PID=0,ImageName=SystemIdleProcess, BasePsi=N/A, CPU=0
PID=4, ImageName=System, BasePsi=Normal, CPU=96/ 85-98When fluctuates
Can someone confirm ther is something wrong with these numbers?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|