Computer Forum Forum Index
Register  FAQ Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in Register 

Why cannot we taste or smell the lipid peroxides in refined

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Computer Forum Forum Index -> diet
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Taka
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:34 pm    Post subject: Why cannot we taste or smell the lipid peroxides in refined Reply with quote

On the following Udo Erasmus site:

http://www.udoerasmus.com/articles/udo/hbaco.htm

he claims that refined oils contain 1% of damaged molecules to start
with and are further oxidized when used in frying. I have also heard
in other places that we cannot recognize how bad refined oils are
using our senses, this works only for unprocessed fats like butter or
virgin olive oil. But from the chemistry lessons I know that fatty
acid aldehydes and peroxides have strong smell and taste of
rancidity. How could this be that the industry manages to mask these
properties? What are the additives which mask the smell? For
instance 4-OHE (posted previously) has quite strong rancid smell in a
pure form. But the cooking oils containing it are odorless. Also
fried food doesn't have any rancid taste.

Taka
Back to top
Google
Sponsor





PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:34 pm    Post subject: Advertisement

Back to top
Mr. Natural-Health
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:41 pm    Post subject: Re: Why cannot we taste or smell the lipid peroxides in refi Reply with quote

On Jan 18, 11:34 am, Taka <taka0...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On the following Udo Erasmus site:

http://www.udoerasmus.com/articles/udo/hbaco.htm

he claims that refined oils contain 1% of damaged molecules to start
with and are further oxidized when used in frying. I have also heard
in other places that we cannot recognize how bad refined oils are
using our senses, this works only for unprocessed fats like butter or
virgin olive oil. But from the chemistry lessons I know that fatty
acid aldehydes and peroxides have strong smell and taste of
rancidity. How could this be that the industry manages to mask these
properties? What are the additives which mask the smell? For
instance 4-OHE (posted previously) has quite strong rancid smell in a
pure form. But the cooking oils containing it are odorless. Also
fried food doesn't have any rancid taste.

If anything is defective, I would say that it is your half-baked
notion that all rancid or otherwise unhealthy oil must smell bad.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Why cannot we taste or smell the lipid peroxides in refi Reply with quote

I had a jar of coconut oil with just a little remaining. I forgot
about it for over a year, then when I opened it, there was a distinct
rancid smell. Also, I made a shortbread with a small amount of
butter,then kept it in a sealed plastic bag in the refrigerator.
After a couple of months, I opened the bag (after not eating any for a
few weeks) and there was a strong rancidity smell. I've had olive oil
that also had that strong smell to it, years ago, when I used small
amounts of it (organic, first pressed, extra virgin). When relatives
or friends eat fries or meat, I can detect what I think is a hint of
rancidity, no matter how "fresh" the ingredients were before cooking.
Back to top
Taka
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:00 am    Post subject: Re: Why cannot we taste or smell the lipid peroxides in refi Reply with quote

Another source claiming that the cooking vegetable oils are generally
safe and "EFAs" are not destroyed:

http://www.essentialfats.com/fapfaq.pdf
Back to top
Taka
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 12:49 pm    Post subject: Re: Why cannot we taste or smell the lipid peroxides in refi Reply with quote

Another source claiming that we can smell the rancidity in unrefined
oils but not in refined oils. This means that the processed oils can
be odorless and tasteless and yet contain dangerous amounts of lipid
peroxides:

QUOTE: Rancid fats and oils taste very bad even in small amounts;
people avoid eating them.[13] It is very difficult to measure or
estimate the actual human consumption of these substances.[14] In
addition, the majority of oils consumed in the United States are
refined, bleached, deodorized and degummed by manufacturers. The
resultant oils are colorless, odorless, tasteless and have a longer
shelf life than their unrefined counterparts.[15] This extensive
processing serves to make peroxidated, rancid oils much more elusive
to detection via the various human senses than the unprocessed
alternatives. UNQUOTE.

SOURCE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atherosclerosis
Back to top
Mark Thorson
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 5:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Why cannot we taste or smell the lipid peroxides in refi Reply with quote

Taka wrote:
Quote:

Another source claiming that we can smell the rancidity in unrefined
oils but not in refined oils. This means that the processed oils can
be odorless and tasteless and yet contain dangerous amounts of lipid
peroxides:

QUOTE: Rancid fats and oils taste very bad even in small amounts;
people avoid eating them.[13] It is very difficult to measure or
estimate the actual human consumption of these substances.[14] In
addition, the majority of oils consumed in the United States are
refined, bleached, deodorized and degummed by manufacturers. The
resultant oils are colorless, odorless, tasteless and have a longer
shelf life than their unrefined counterparts.[15] This extensive
processing serves to make peroxidated, rancid oils much more elusive
to detection via the various human senses than the unprocessed
alternatives. UNQUOTE.

SOURCE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atherosclerosis

Wikipedia is not the primary source for that "information".
Check the references. The source is Udo Erasmus,
who is not a reliable source for information about
fats and oils.

His book cites many scientific articles in its
bibliography, but they are not cited in the text. He says
lots of true stuff as well as stuff that may or may not be
true and stuff that is untrue, but he doesn't connect any
of his statements to his sources, so you can't check
them out for accuracy.

He advocates many fringe theories, such as food combining
(the theory that meat shouldn't be eaten together with
starches [p. 32]) and homeopathy (the theory that
extremely dilute solutions of toxic materials can have
medicinal properties [p. 87]).

Like all effective propaganda, his book is a mixture of
fact and fiction, with no help to the reader in determining
which is which. Don't be fooled by the thin veneer of
science he wraps his theories in -- he's just trying to sell
you his theories (and his line of Udo's Choice oils).

And even common sense should tell you that the notion
that refined oils are rich in oxidized oils is
obviously bogus. If it were true that you can detect them
at low concentration by smell only when the oil is in a
raw, unprocessed state, then what you are smelling or
tasting is not the oxidized oils -- it's whatever
other stuff is present that's removed during refining.

Hpwever, the fact is that you can detect these oxidized
oils at low concentration. The notion that they
are often present in refined oils is simply untrue.
It's a myth made up by a charlatan who wants to be able
to point at a perfectly wholesome product and convince
you that there's something wrong with it, so that
you'll be scared into buying his alternative oil.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Computer Forum Forum Index -> diet All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Computer Forum